grantee/beneficiary; (2) grantor’s/testator’s full knowledge and deliberation of his actions
and their consequences; and (3) independent consent and action by the grantor/testator.” While this burden can be overcome, as it was in the Hart case, it does illustrate the lengths that a gift recipient must go through to prove that the gift was not unduly influenced. In that case, the gift recipient was able to show through the testimony of independent witnesses, such as lawyers, that the decedent knew what he was doing when making the gift. The case illustrates the importance of making sure that a good record is made during the giver's lifetime when gifts, whether lifetime or as part of a will, are made to individuals with a confidential relationship to the giver.
The case also illustrates that such gifts can be easily attacked, and in cases without a good trail of evidence of the giver's intent and knowledge, can be overturned. If you believe that you have been cheated out of an inheritance by a caregiver's undue influence, our firm may be able to help. Please feel free to call for a complementary phone consultation at (601)925-9797.
Comments